[CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usTue Jan 25 19:49:04 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benjamin Smith wrote: <snip> > On my hard disk, I have my /home, /boot, and / directories each on their > own partitions, and when I'm upgrading my Fedora, I just format / and /boot, > and leave /home alone. Although I've transfered it a few times between hard <snip> Yep. ALWAYS have /home on its own partition. You *might* want /opt on its own, also. For more on my views on this, here's my copy of the article I had published a few years ago in SysAdmin (now defunct, unfortunately) <http://24.5-cent.us/upgrading_linux.doc> mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list