[CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
Brian Mathis
brian.mathis at gmail.comWed Jan 26 14:58:25 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Always Learning <centos at g7.u22.net> wrote: [...] > .fs > # /bin/bash > find /data -iwholename *$1 > find /ax -iwholename *$1 > find /bx -iwholename *$1 > find /cx -iwholename *$1 > > Obviously with the chmod +x. The last one makes searching times much > faster when seeking non-operating system files. > [...] > Paul. > England, > EU. You may not be aware of the "locate" command? Nightly there is a job that runs (updatedb) that scans the disk and saves file locations. Locate searches this database instead of you have to do a 'find'. The only thing it won't get are files that were added since the last 'updatedb' run. You can run that whenever you want to update the db, or use find in those cases.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list