[CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
John Hodrien
J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.ukThu Jan 27 07:56:19 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Always Learning wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. Now I know why locate never usually worked > for me - it hadn't updated. > > find is fast, especially when I restrict the search paths. But locate is faster still, in all but the smallest of cases. I'd only tend to use find if I had reason to think that changes had made the locate database invalid. locate with a regexp is plain good and fast. jh
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list