Hi, it works just fine for me, but there is no quota support in the 5.5 ext4 release Giuseppe Il 28/01/2011 08:51, Sorin Srbu ha scritto: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of compdoc >> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:09 PM >> To: 'CentOS mailing list' >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64 >> >>> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on >> CentOS 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you > feel the >> stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and >> comments welcome. >> >> >> I've recently been using ext4 because I have servers with large(ish) > storage >> volumes, and because I know that the next version of centos will support it >> better than 5.5. >> >> I only use it for storage, where I use rsync to copy terabytes of data to >> and from the servers. >> >> It works fine - it's been set and forget so far. Very fast read/write >> speeds. > Same story here. I'm building a new backup server from scratch (with no old > data on it), and while ext3 is nice and stable it's also pretty slow when we > start talking sevenish terabytes. > > My main concern is all the writing on the interweb regarding running an fsck > and a tune2fs after having formatted the filesystem to ext4; some say you > should while some say it isn't necessary. > Anyway, I get a bad block message when running fsck, and am not sure > whether this is a interface problem between the chair and the monitor or > something with the tech preview. > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110128/90c30df8/attachment-0004.html>