On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Brian Mathis wrote: > PLEASE STOP. WE DO NOT NEED THIS AGAIN, ESPECIALLY SO CLOSE TO RELEASE. +10000000000000000000000000000 FWIW, traffic on the mirror list says C6 is being rsync'd to the external mirrors as I type this. Regards, -- Tom Diehl tdiehl at rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123 at rogueind.com > > > -☙ Brian Mathis ❧- > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Ron Blizzard <rb4centos at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Steven Crothers >> <steven.crothers at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thankfully some good things have come of this complete disaster that is >>> CentOS 6. >>> * Scientific Linux 6 >>> * Oracle Enterprise 6 (Which is free to download folks) >>> * Clear-OS Core (Which is ran by a professional organization instead of a >>> group if you're into that) >> >> Uh... Scientific Linux didn't "come from" CentOS. It's been in >> existence since 2004. Oracle Linux? Go for it, if supporting a >> parasitical, ungrateful corporation is your thing and if you like to >> pay for updates to them (I would just use Red Hat, if it were me). >> Clear-OS Core? Strange, I don't see its 6.0 version available for >> download yet. They've got an alpha out there, but it remains to be >> seen how will they'll rebuild Red Hat and how long their rebuilding >> project will last. I'm guessing they'll find it's a lot of work, go >> back to using CentOS and put their time back into their main product >> line. But we'll see. >> >> -- >> RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >