On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 21:09 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > B.J. McClure wrote: > > Here is my setup which includes a few packages from rpmforge. Same > > setup on a dozen desktops with various hardware. All play mp3. > > > > ~]$ rpm -qa | grep gstreamer > > gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.11-1.el6.rf.x86_64 > > phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.6.2-17.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.19-2.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.16-2.el6.rf.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.19-2.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-python-0.10.16-1.1.el6.x86_64 > > PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin-0.5.8-13.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-tools-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.23-1.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.19-3.el6.rf.x86_64 > > gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64 > > [bmcclure at house ~]$ > > > RPMForge is not "the base/official repo", and you are using -ugly- > package for MP3 Gee, I think I mentioned that in the first line of my post. > Quote: > "GStreamer Ugly Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that have good quality and > correct functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The > license on either the plug-ins or the supporting libraries might not be > how we'd like. The code might be widely known to present patent problems." Most everyone is aware of that, however, there is a legal distinction between "using" and "distributing", at least where I live. Cheers, B.J. > Ljubomir > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos RHEL 6.0, Linux 2.6.32-131.2.1.el6.x86_64 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110709/c7dabcbe/attachment-0005.html>