On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi at softdux.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen > <peter.peltonen at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: >>>> >>>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :) >>> >>> Far from it. Xen still has a place as a dom0. >> >> What are the reasons for people staying with Xen as dom0, just the >> learning curve? Or are there some technical considerations as well? > > > KVM is not as mature as XEN. yet....? And if you want to use a so > called Enterprise Operating System like CentOS, then you'd probably > expect a stable and "enterprise" grade virtualization kernel as well. > > KVM, IMO (and others as well ) is not enterprise ready yet. I'd edit what you've said in two ways. 1. The tools to manage KVM aren't as mature as the tools to manage Xen. 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL.