[CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Jul 5 12:46:24 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/5/11 6:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a >>> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much >>> less prone to unrecoverable data loss. >> >> Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster than >> EXT2? >> > > The optimum on an EXT basis for a filesystem that does not require > journaling going forwards would be EXT4 with no journal... that way > you get the benefit of extents etc without a journal slowing you > down.... A better option than EXT2 ;) Won't that mean that starting up after a crash or power loss will always require an fsck which might be slow depending on how many files are on the partition? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list