[CentOS] centos 64 bit

Wed Jul 13 12:42:08 UTC 2011
Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com>

At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:17:55 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
> 
> > for many things, 32bit code is more compact and runs faster than 64bit 
> > code (primarily because the code is smaller, so it requires fewer 
> > fetches, more code fits in the cache, etc).    64 bit OS's totally 
> > compatible with 32bit applications.  of course, if a process needs more 
> > than a couple gigabytes of address space, then 64bit is a no-brainer, 
> > but there's really not that many applications which need that sort of 
> > memory.
> 
> Is that generally true?  I thought running in 64bit got you access to twice as
> many registers and that generally you'd expect better performance from x86_64
> code not worse.  While pointers would be doubled in size, most of your memory
> consumption would boil down to base types that'd be of the same size.

For some applications the performance advantage of having more
registers is small and the overhead of a larger executable is larger.
There is not any sort of absolute or fixed rule that says that all
applications *always* run faster, etc. when compiled for 64-bit,
although most do.  Also there are odd-ball applications that it is not
worth the effort to make them 64-bit clean.  And there are *still* a
few bits and pieces that have not (officially) migrated to 64-bit
(Adobe's Flash is not *officially* available as a 64-bit plugin,
although a 'beta' 64-bit version is available).

> 
> jh
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
>                               

-- 
Robert Heller             -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com
Deepwoods Software        -- http://www.deepsoft.com/
()  ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   -- against proprietary attachments