On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:19 -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 06:49 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > >> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 09:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: > >> > easier just to give up - I moved my new servers to ubuntu - no more > >> new CentOS installs any more. I'm just going to maintain the CentOS 5 > >> installs at this point. > >> > >> Holy shit, man! I'd never, by choice, put in an Ubuntu server. Debian, > >> sure (though I'm a Red Hat and Red Hat based guy), but Ubuntu? Forget > >> it! > >> > >> I hope you find it as stable and reliable as CentOS. > > ---- > > heck it's still Linux and pretty much the same. > > > > Red Hat went far too long between releases and it is clear to me that I > > can't possibly rely on CentOS for timeliness. > > Timeliness, dunno. Ubuntu (or fedora) for production? NOT IF I HAVE ANY > CONTROL!!! Given how many developers write incredibly fragile code, that > is utterly dependent upon a very, very special environment, I guarantee > that the almost daily updates will break it, or the New Features! will > have changed interfaces.... ---- Actually the company I work for has been switching from CentOS to Ubuntu - no problems. The company I worked for last year was switching from CentOS to Ubuntu - no problems. I don't know the attrition rate but it has been 100% in the companies I have worked for the past 2 years. I think that some people just get their thinking locked into a specific notion and won't let go. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.