On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com>wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:28:43 +0200: > > > You failed to mention that this is CentOS 4 kernel, am I correct it is > > C4? > > No, c4 is a host numbering scheme. This is the latest series 5 kernel. > 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5xen. What I didn't mention is that it is the xen kernel > on x64. > > Most of the errors on Google seems to account for bugs in drivers failing to keep track of how many objects they've added to sysfs. http://www.google.com/search?q= "EEXIST%2C+don't+try+to+register+things+with+the+same+name+in+the+same+directory" RH Bugzilla: http://bit.ly/jQHbXa I wouldn't be too worried, it just seems to be repeating something it has already done. I'm not too familiar on how such thing should be reported. Should a bug be created in the CentOS bug database? -- Giovanni Tirloni -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110627/cc7b30e1/attachment-0005.html>