In a server with raid1 a first smart error was reported. Smart attributes: SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 185 183 021 Pre-fail Always - 7750 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 20 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 075 075 000 Old_age Always - 18868 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 18 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 10 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 28 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 121 115 000 Old_age Always - 31 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 1 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 I assume, raw read error rate is ok. So I would use the same disk for resyncing the raid. Other recommendations? Helmut -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110630/8c3312a3/attachment-0004.html>