On 03/01/11 5:55 PM, Markus Falb wrote: > On 2.3.2011 02:15, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> I know FTP can be a nightmare: I thought FTPS had pretty much >> addressed the separate data and control channel issues, or am I >> profoundly mistaken? > Running ftp over ssl is not changing the ftp protocol. SSL or not, there > are the same "open up a bunch of passive ports for data channel" insanities. and, worse, since the control channel is encrypted, this can't be done via a port monitor that sniffs and modifies 'port' commands, so this causes problems at BOTH ends of a NAT