On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > robert mena wrote: >> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no plans >> to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this as >> personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about it. >> >> The solution is good now and will be good whenever it appears. So there > <snip> > Actually, it strikes me that I *do* have a question: what are the main > problems in the build/release? Has RH deliberately obscured some part(s) > of its build process, or made prerequisites utterly dependent upon > specific versions of libraries - that is, more than y'all have had to deal > with before? > > Note that this is a question about the problemss, *not* about how y'all > are going about it, nor whining that I Want It Yesterday!!! As someone who > spent a lot of years as a developer (and let's not talk about the death > march at a former Baby Bell), I like to know the kinds of problems that > are ongoing, so I can get some feel for what's going on. > > mark "sorry, no time to do some of the real work, RL is overwhelming > at the moment" > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I saw this posted yesterday on h-online.com. http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html