Jason Brown wrote: > On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> robert mena wrote: >>> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no >>> plans to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this >>> as personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about it. >>> >>> The solution is good now and will be good whenever it appears. So >> <snip> >> Actually, it strikes me that I *do* have a question: what are the main >> problems in the build/release? Has RH deliberately obscured some part(s) >> of its build process, or made prerequisites utterly dependent upon >> specific versions of libraries - that is, more than y'all have had to >> deal with before? <snip> > I saw this posted yesterday on h-online.com. > > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html Don't know h-online, but that's *real* interesting, and explains a lot: not us, but Them (Oracle). Having had my recent experience with Oracle (which I posted here a month or so ago), I can understand why they don't want to help them.... mark