On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:25 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > James Nguyen wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd <slackmoehrle.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Brian, >>> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your >>> reply. >>>> >>>> OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It > <snip> >> if they think the solution requires a lot of CPU. Memory wise I think >> machines come with at least 4Gb these days. That should do. You can >> probably both boxes for around 2k? >> >> You already know how much F5 or any of those guys cost per device. =) > > Hmmm... when the job I was at went with Radware, their price was > significantly lower than F5, and I was impressed with the appliance. Nice > little 1u box, not even a pizza box deep, as I recall. > > mark > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Keep in mind you'd want at least 2 either it be appliances, devices or server boxes. The minimum for high availability is at least 2. That's assuming your power and internet route is already highly redundant as well. ;) -- James H. Nguyen CallFire :: Systems Architect http://www.callfire.com 1.949.625.4263