On 03/08/11 11:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/8/2011 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote: >>> Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really >>> really bad idea... >> go away. it isn't 1998 anymore. > Still, consumer type NAT routers are really cheap, take little power, > and would 'just work' in this scenario if you put both the windows and > centos boxes behind it. I concur. But I suspect the OPs issue is a simple network configuration issue as Windows ICS uses 192.168.0.0/24 and he rattled off some 172.16 net in his route command. oh look, its our friend 'never read the manual' hadi again. I'm out.