On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> >> And then looking at the reason for the fails: >> >> Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out: >> --- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.000000000 -0500 >> +++ work/RHEL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.000000000 -0500 >> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ >> libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) >> libsmime3.so()(64bit) >> libssl3.so()(64bit) >> -libtalloc.so.1()(64bit) >> +libtalloc.so.2()(64bit) >> libtevent.so.0()(64bit) >> libxmlrpc.so.3()(64bit) >> libxmlrpc_client.so.3()(64bit) >> >> >> Differing package requirements libtevent-0.9.8-10.el5.x86_64.rpm.out: >> --- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:26.000000000 -0500 >> +++ work/RHEL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:26.000000000 -0500 >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) >> -libtalloc.so.1()(64bit) >> +libtalloc.so.2()(64bit) >> libtevent.so.0()(64bit) >> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 >> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 >> ========================================================================================= >> >> What does that mean ... it means that those 2 packages were built >> against the wrong version of libtalloc. Those packages use the older > > Ouch. Johnny, I'd really like to replicate this error, but I just > don't have the visibility into your build configurations. Saying "it's > easy to do yourself" doesn't work, because there are subtleties in the > configurations, such as whether "mock" configurations use the older, > CentOS 5.5 release or the existing set up updated CentOS pre-release > 5.6 components, that can generate precisely this sort of issue. CentOS has it lined correctly ... it is SL that has it linked incorrectly. I have been building CentOS for 8 years Nico .. I do NOT need your help to build it. I try to tell you how I build it, but you tell me I don't know what I am doing. If you want to use CentOS then use it. Stop filling up the mailing lists with your trolling diatribe. Get this straight ... I do not need you to "TEACH" me anything about CentOS, the process used to build it, the process used to distribute it, how it originated, where it is moving to, or anything else about it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110323/ef721140/attachment-0005.sig>