On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>> CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
>> delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
>> 133 days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)).
>
> You keep tossing out "late". "late" implies a published deadline
> and I've yet to see one. I see "best effort" and "will try"
> comments in many places, but never a published deadline. So,
> why the focus on "late"?
John,
The definition of "late" according to many dictionaries:
after the expected or usual time
Let me ask you the same question, why the focus on "late" ?
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]