On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, David Sommerseth <dazo at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 27/03/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote: >> Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... >> >> Still not decided about virtualization platform for my "webhotel v2" >> (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). >> >> KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 >> will not be out in time for me - I guess KVM would be more mature in >> CentOS 6. > > I believe KVM was introduced in RHEL5.4, so I presume CentOS5.5 have a > working KVM support as well, in addition to Xen. Of course, it will be > even better with CentOS6. > > For the impatient souls, ScientificLinux 6.0 is released - even though, > discussions lately in this list raises some concerns regarding how good the > binary compatibility is in SL6, compared to CentOS6. If it's good enough for Fermilab/CERN then it's prolly good enough for many (even most) people on this list, imho. :)