[CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
aurfalien at gmail.com
aurfalien at gmail.comThu Mar 3 21:32:50 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
- Next message: [CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday, March 03, 2011 04:04:42 pm Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Although it's not there yet, I'm sure we'll get there sooner than >> expected > > To be fair to VMware Fusion on OS X, the graphics acceleration is > fantastic, running Windows 7 in full Aero mode with no problems. > But it still can't keep accurate time. In general yes its fine, but for specific targeted needs, virtualization may not be a viable option which I think was the point. I think pass through is very very cool which VMware Player/Fusion doesn't do regarding graphics. Having multiple cards/resources in a host and doling em out/dedicating them to any VM would be very cool. Hence PVOPS 2.6.32 and Xen 4.0.1. Although KVM is also supposed to do this. - aurf
- Previous message: [CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
- Next message: [CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list