[CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comSun Mar 20 19:30:34 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities
- Next message: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > . >> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with >> RH >> for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable >> binaries for free. > > Yes, but patches (support) cost money, as you might know. Anyway, it > is better to pay for real > RH instead of oracle linux.. Or, maybe there was back in the days when they released source that matched their binaries... Personally, I think everyone would be better off today if they had turned their back on anything RH-related the day they stopped permitting redistribution of their binaries among the community that created them and made them usable in the first place. I was too lazy to change and Centos made it look reasonable to leave things approximately the same. But, now that RH is putting the screws on anyone who doesn't pay up it is probably time for anyone who cares about free software to rethink things. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities
- Next message: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list