On 05/10/2011 08:12 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> Alain Péan wrote: >> > The problem is that when C6.0 will be released, it is likely that RHEL >>> 6.1 will be already released. So there will be no security updates for >>> C6.0, and it will be better to stay under SL6, until the release of >>> C6.1. I already installed three machines under SL6, and it works fine. >> >> Once 6.0 packages are figured out (how to compile them), newer versions >> of those packages in 6.1 will be much easier to compile, so I expect no >> more then one month to pass from C6.0 to C6.1 > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would > take no more than 1 month ? Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110511/9edc5c0c/attachment-0005.sig>