Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > >> > >> > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less >> > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? >> > >> > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 >> would >> > take no more than 1 month ? >> >> Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake. >> >> >> >> >> Why? seems like a valid point to me. >> > > 1. Have you, or anyone else, noticed the speed of the CentOS-5 and > CentOS-4 updates recently? We have spread out the building and checking > up updates .. there has been a marked improvement is release speed for > updates. > Yes - noted and appreciated > 2. Have you, or anyone else, noticed that we have started pushing out > the upstream EL Fastrack channel for CentOS-5. In CentOS it is named > fasttrack (spelling) on our end due to upstream IP restrictions. > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/fasttrack/ > Yes noted > 3. Have you, or anyone else, noticed the QA tracking site that is open > to the public? > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/ > > There is a dashboard of recent events: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/dashboard > > There is even an RSS feed: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/feed > > Most of the names who are posting there and taking action are NOT CentOS > Project guys, but community people ... isn't that what people were > asking for? > Yes - I even saw a calendar with some target and milestones > 4. Have you, or anyone else, noticed the aggregated list of status > announcements that we now have? The forum moderators are great and they > have started an announcement forum area where they aggregate important > information: > > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewforum.php?forum=53 > > > ================================================== > > It does not seem to matter what we try to do, what we get is petty > comments about how nothing changes. Nothing could be further from the > truth. > Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestions Keep up the great work - Thanks > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rkampen.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 337 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110512/32ed5f4c/attachment-0005.vcf>