Dne 13.5.2011 6:58, David Mehler napsal(a): > Hello, > > Thank you everyone for your replies. I would definitely like to stick > with postfix as it's what i'm most comfortable with. The problem is > dovecot. I believe it's extras there's the 1.0.7 dovecot, I'd like to > be running the 2.0.x dovecot prefered or the 1.2.x version if not, the > problem is the only place I can find to get them at in rpm form they > are broken, both those versions. I am not an rpm compilation guru I > can compile an src.rpm in to a binary package, which is how I upgraded > postfix, but making one from scratch is over my head. Unless anyone > has a 2.0.x or 1.2.x version of dovecot i'm going to have to switch > pop/imap servers for this configuration. I don't want to run a xinetd > service, so that's out and i'd prefer having my pop/imap server in a > single package. The two packages I can think of as alternatives to > dovecot are courier-imap and cyrus-imap. I'd appreciate experiences > pro conn with each. And if anyone has that dovecot or can help me make > one offlist i'd appreciate that as well. > Thanks. > Dave. David, I'm sure atrpms 2.x version of Dovecot is ok and I'm also sure that 1.2.x within my repo and within atrpms are ok too. I do prefer Dovecot, but when it comes to alternatives, I can also recommend Cyrus. One of the instances I manage has 30 thousands of mailboxes running on a single box smoothly and easily. Regards, DH