On 05/18/2011 08:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > It was discussed, but that doesn't change anyone's mindset about open vs. closed > processes or whether being more open and permitting community insight and > participation would ultimately keep the project from going the way of Whitebox. Hello Les, CentOS is used on more web servers than Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Fedora combined ... it is not going anywhere. Also, the slight decrease that was happening in Linux in general (which was mirrored by CentOS) in October of 2010 is also corrected. http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-centos/all/all Facebook uses thousands of CentOS servers. They are quite happy with it. Amazon EC2 has thousands of CentOS servers. They are also quite happy with it. We just became a fully supported OS on Microsoft Hyper-V. Can we do a better job at some things, sure. But trust me, CentOS is going nowhere. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110518/843a4e8a/attachment-0005.sig>