On Thu, 19 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when > publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if > you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just > how bad things were and how much we gained from that process). But > wasn't closing the process and letting 'experts' do that before shipping > supposed to have improved things? You'll have to direct questions of the upstream's intent to the upstream -- Russ herrold