Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/22/2011 02:57 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > Having slept on that, I don't think my previous reply was direct to your > accusation. <snip> > My entire participation in the last long thread was directed at users > who have unrealistic expectations of the CentOS release team. One, in > particular, thought that 6.1 should be available in less than a month. > In the last two years, only 4.9 was released that quickly. Expecting a > new release in less than 30 days is unrealistic and leads to > disappointment and frustration among users. And suddenly, for a few > messages in one thread, I'm "customarily" a troll? I don't post often, > and when I do I try to provide useful information. I'm somewhat upset. > I think you've completely misinterpreted what was stated in the > presentation to which you linked. Protecting your project does not mean > labeling every person that you disagree with a troll and blasting them. > You've been quite rude, and I hope you reconsider this new personal > policy. R P Herrold reacted to mail that looked like totally unnecessary. I will not get into his reaction, but I was confused why you sent that mail and to whom was directed. I was not able to find a point that was not said, and was wondering why you posted it, then I disregarded it and forgot it. I guess Herrold misinterpreted your post for trying to stir trouble. I was first to suggest that C6.1 **might** be released in **about** a month from C6.0. Why? Because I suspect that since RHEL 6.1 srpms are already published, devs could use free time, while waiting for QA team to find bugs, to dry-run 6.1 srpms and see how many problems there are. Any having fresh experience with 6.0, they do not need to try to remember what was it that made a problem several months ago, in case of version to version time span. I believe that devs are already working on 6.1, lightly but steadily. Then everybody cough on that and started endless flame-war. Ljubomir