On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:28:00AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > Good grief! Back in '06 and '07, where I worked, I had to build php > because it didn't have mcrypt support by default. They *still* don't, at > this late date? I'm sure that there was a valid reason for this changelog entry from php53-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1.src.rpm but as the referenced bugzilla tickets are restricted I can't say what that reason might be. Intellectual rights issue with one of the included crypt schemes, perhaps? * Fri Mar 26 2010 Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> - 5.3.2-2 - remove mcrypt support (#459804, #577257) John -- DMR: So fsck was originally called something else. Q: What was it called? DMR: Well, the second letter was different. -- Dennis M. Ritchie, Usenix, June 18, 1998. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110525/7c0c554c/attachment-0005.sig>