[CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comThu May 12 20:36:53 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP
- Next message: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/12/11 1:07 PM, aurfalien at gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS? > > We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its > basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS > claims more robust replication, etc... > > Granted I am working with the version bundled with CentOS, I do > understand that the latest OpenLDAP is wayyyyyyy betterrrr :) what about the CentOS DS based on Redhat DS ? http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/DirectoryServerSetup http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/index.html or, 389, formerly Fedora DS, http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ afaik, 389 and RedhatDS are closely related, these are all descendents of the Netscape Directory Server
- Previous message: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP
- Next message: [CentOS] ApacheDS vs OpenLDAP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list