[CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)
Akemi Yagi
amyagi at gmail.comFri May 13 00:55:12 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)
- Next message: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, <aurfalien at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to >> agree with CentOS' choice here. > > +1 I think *both* distros made the right choice. :) CentOS and SL handle security updates differently. CentOS's choice was right for CentOS because the delivery of security updates provided by 5.6 was more urgent for existing 5.x users than getting a "non-existing" new major release out. SL's choice was right for SL because they backport security updates. This is similar to what upstream's EUS (Extended Update Support) provides -- one can stay at a point release (like 5.4) for a period of time security fixes are available. So doing 6.0 first is not a concern for 5.x users. Akemi
- Previous message: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)
- Next message: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list