On 5/12/11, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at nasa.gov> wrote: >> Apparently they did admit and it does change: >> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347&forum=53 > > Late breaking news: > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/67 > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/69 This is really nice and it's good to see that the devs did take all those feedback into consideration and did something to make the process more visible. As for SL vs CentOS choices, I'd agree both teams did the right thing if only because of how I'm using them. I get to update my existing C5.5s yet at the same time I could use SL6 to begin testing for upcoming deployment as well as troubleshoot potential issues I had with running KVM.