[CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

Fri Nov 11 12:45:19 UTC 2011
Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>

Am 11.11.2011 13:38, schrieb Craig White:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 01:05 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> James A. Peltier wrote:
>>> Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well.  It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next
>>> release.  Get used to it. ;)
>> Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose.
>> One can't help wondering if the simplicity of the old grub
>> offended the developers.
>> Simplicity does not seem to be highly valued nowadays.

> grub2 has more utility (ie can boot of the newer fs types like ext4) and
> thus was inevitable.

so tell me why i do not need GRUB2 for this more than a year? #1 SMP Tue Nov 1 18:17:12 UTC 2011

/dev/md1      ext4     29G  8,0G   21G  28% /
/dev/md0      ext4    485M   52M  429M  11% /boot
/dev/md2      ext4    3,6T  602G  3,0T  17% /mnt/data

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111111/444ddca5/attachment-0005.sig>