Am 11.11.2011 13:38, schrieb Craig White: > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 01:05 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> James A. Peltier wrote: >> >>> Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next >>> release. Get used to it. ;) >> >> Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose. >> One can't help wondering if the simplicity of the old grub >> offended the developers. >> Simplicity does not seem to be highly valued nowadays. > grub2 has more utility (ie can boot of the newer fs types like ext4) and > thus was inevitable. so tell me why i do not need GRUB2 for this more than a year? 2.6.40.8-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 1 18:17:12 UTC 2011 /dev/md1 ext4 29G 8,0G 21G 28% / /dev/md0 ext4 485M 52M 429M 11% /boot /dev/md2 ext4 3,6T 602G 3,0T 17% /mnt/data -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111111/444ddca5/attachment-0005.sig>