On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Scott Silva wrote: > I suppose it would have to be more like disparate subfolders shared under one > root... In which case it might as well just be a bunch of symlinks, and that's fairly easy to automatically maintain. jh
Tue Nov 15 20:30:53 UTC 2011
John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Scott Silva wrote: > I suppose it would have to be more like disparate subfolders shared under one > root... In which case it might as well just be a bunch of symlinks, and that's fairly easy to automatically maintain. jh