[CentOS] What happened to 6.1
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Nov 1 15:24:24 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1
- Next message: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > No clone distros, including CentOS and Scientific Linux, are perfect. > If someone asks which of the two has a better binary compatibility, I > would answer, "they are equally good". One of the 'selling points' as a big reason to use open source is that you can fix problems or add features on your own by rebuilding from source. If, in fact, you cannot rebuild a src rpm and get a working copy then in that respect you might as well be using closed, proprietary software. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1
- Next message: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list