[CentOS] redhat vs centos
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usWed Nov 2 20:18:07 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
- Next message: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David HrbÃ¡Ä wrote: > Dne 2.11.2011 18:43, Bill Campbell napsal(a): >> We were using that about 5 years ago, and paid Novell a fair amount of >> money in their Partner program. Novell's support was slim to >> non-existent leading to our move to CentOS. >> >> Given the recent sale to Attachmate and such, I wouldn't invest any time >> or money in SLES. > > Our many years experience with SLES is the very same. It is "enterprise" > and certified distro, but I would not invest the cent into it. One of > the reasons we are using CentOS. Last time I paid any real attention to it, a few years ago, SuSE was the big dog in Europe, and RH in the US. I'd figure RH still is, given that it's IBM's partner. mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
- Next message: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list