[CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Nov 10 20:37:01 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu
- Next message: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > CentOS is what it is: as close as possible to upstream EL without being upstream EL. Nothing more, nothing less, and bug-for-bug compatible. If that's not what you need, then CentOS won't meet your need. Yes, but that 'possible' part is the problem. How much reason do you have to think that it will continue to be possible to be anywhere close to upstream? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu
- Next message: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list