[CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
Alan McKay
alan.mckay at gmail.comTue Nov 15 02:56:17 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility > and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither > is perfect. That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1 (and so long ago at that)? -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list