[CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgTue Nov 15 22:18:16 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/14/2011 08:56 PM, Alan McKay wrote: >> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility >> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither >> is perfect. > > That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1 > (and so long ago at that)? > > We have a CR repository that has a bunch of 6.1 (and updates newer than 6.1 as well) in there. It is not like there are no updates to 6.0 released. The ISOs for 6.1 are not released, but the RPMs are. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111115/9e605af9/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list