[CentOS] What happened to 6.1
Reindl Harald
h.reindl at thelounge.netTue Nov 15 22:47:24 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 15.11.2011 23:43, schrieb John R. Dennison: >> >> I was wondering if it would be safe to just stay with the 'standard' >> repo for centos and wait for 6.1 that way or do you suggest adding the >> CR repo as a necessary event? > > Depends on if you feel that security updates are important to your > infrastructure. but why in the world is an extra repo needed for security-updates? it is like a bad joke installing a os and have to search how to install a repo for ESSENTIAL updates while most people think "i have a package manager and get updates" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111115/6beea3a1/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list