[CentOS] How can rpm "%{SUMMARY}" not be consistent?
John Hodrien
J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.ukWed Nov 16 14:56:13 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] How can rpm "%{SUMMARY}" not be consistent?
- Next message: [CentOS] How can rpm "%{SUMMARY}" not be consistent?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote: > What you are seeing is indeed odd. I see 'version 3.1' but not '3.2' > anywhere on the Summary line of bash. What is your kernel by the way? > uname -mr ? > > Have you cleared yum cache? Not just running a 'yum clean all' but > emptying the /var/cache/yum directory ? Why would yum cache have any bearing on what rpm reported? jh
- Previous message: [CentOS] How can rpm "%{SUMMARY}" not be consistent?
- Next message: [CentOS] How can rpm "%{SUMMARY}" not be consistent?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list