[CentOS] redhat vs centos

Wed Nov 2 04:21:20 UTC 2011
Christopher Chan <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>

On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:47 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:30:57AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
>>> Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
>>>> Real "problem" with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
>>>> (or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL
>>>> clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat community.
>>>
>>> Well, there are no other RHEL clones except SL/Centos. We have quite
>>> large infrastructure and we want it homogeneous as possible. Because we
>>> run a few boxes with IBM, Ora stuff we need "certified" OSes, certified
>>> is only RHEL or SuSE. So we are using RHEL and Centos. We have been
>>> running happily and smoothly for a few years with this concept. Because
>>> of the lastest issues with CentOS we are really considering moving back
>>> to Debian.
>>
>> Ever heard of WBL? :-D
>
> White Box Linux?
>
> Isn't it dead?
>

Same thought I had when I saw someone on irc say he is using WBL...