Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 11/15/2011 04:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us piše: >>> The "preupgrade" is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now >>> building boxes here with 500M instead of 100M root partitions, figuring >>> that it's what's coming for CentOS, eventually. >> +1 > > I doubt that. The issue isn't the technology but the support issues that > can arise from updating systems between releases. Red Hat would have to > test all kinds of update scenarios and not only between two releases but > they'd also have to take into account systems that have been upgraded > several times. I'm pretty sure they will stick to the service migration > update path they are using now. preupgrade is only for migration for full releases, and does sorta kinda work.... It's been in fedora a year or so; I'm *not* looking forward to it hitting RHEL, and so CentOS, but I'm figuring it will, in another year or two. mark