Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 12:39 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >>>> <Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr> wrote: <snip> >>> Now, for version 6, they have: >>> >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation FasTrack (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server FasTrack (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop FasTrack (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Scalable File System (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Load Balancer (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node FasTrack (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Performance Network (v. 6) >>> Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization >>> >>> They have the same install groups with different packages based on the >>> above groupings, so we have to do some kind of custom generation of the >>> comps files to things work. >> >> Wait, are you saying that a given install group name installs different >> packages, depending on the release name? I mean, if I were working on >> the team, I'd build an Everything release group, and just have subsets, >> based on which release group was chosen. <snip> > No what I mean is, there is an "install group" named "ha" (with a High > Availability description) whose definition might contain 20 packages on > the Server media set, 15 packages on Workstation media set, 8 packages > on the Desktop Media set, and 50 packages on Resilient Storage media set. Oy! And are those on different media? I mean, how many DVD's is RH producing these days, and do you have to buy one or the other? > > CentOS only has one product ... so we need a compilation of the install > information from all of the different media groups ... what you would > have found in the AS type product of EL3. Only now we have to build > this compilation from all the component parts, or else we can not allow > group type installations from within the installer. Which is very appreciated. "Productization", making trying to build a system harder. > > ha was one example, but "office programs" or "graphical internet" are > other examples. Right - I had to edit our perl ks.cgi, because they changed the name or spelling of things like office, or gnome, or KDE....