On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Negative <negativebinomial at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Negative <negativebinomial at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> >>> Negative wrote: >>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> > Negative wrote: >>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> >> Negative wrote: >>> <snip> >>> >> > I still wonder what is causing this. I couldn't find any mention of >>> a >>> >> > similar problem, including on my desktop in my office, where I have >>> a >>> >> > very similar setup, with four kvm guests, two Fedora, one Centos 6 >>> and >>> >> > one Windows XP. >>> <snip> >>> Do I remember this is 5.7? Look at the announcement that *just* came out >>> in the last hour, with the libX11 bugfix. >>> <https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1351.html> says "Previously, in >>> the 64-bit mode, libX11 computed addresses using the 32-bit arithmetic. >>> As >>> a consequence, under heavy load, applications running in the X >>> environment >>> terminated unexpectedly. A patch has been provided to address this issue, >>> and the crashes no longer occur in the described scenario." >>> >>> mark >>> >>> > And, Mark, thanks for mentioning it. > > >> >> If this isn't my lucky day. RH and Centos solved my problem even before I >> defined it. >> >> I saw the update earlier and didn't dare hope. I updated and it seems to >> have solved the issue. On the host machine, I fired up virt-manager, started >> the Fedora guest and it's been up for a half hour. >> >> Now I, too, can start complaining about Gnome 3. I've read it's like >> Windows, but it's the spitting image of the Mac OS. >> >> >> > I spoke too soon. Crashed again after being up for several hours. I'm running memtest86 now.