On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> >> You'd need a copyright owner to initiate legal action. And the FSF >> generally is more concerned about source availability although >> binaries are clearly derived from source and covered by the same >> copyright, and I can't see any exception at least in GPLv2 about being >> able to put additional redistribution/use restrictions on covered >> binaries. >> > > They are not restricting your right to distribute, they are restricting > your access to RHN if you choose to distribute. Which is explicitly imposing additional restrictions. Which is explicitly prohibited in section 6. I don't see any exceptions relating to what the consequences of those restrictions might be. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com