On 09/13/11 9:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
>> > Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
>> > 4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?!
> Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!
yeah I noticed that they've changed that. in 4.x, cd centos; ln -s 4
4.8 but in 5.x+, its more like,
cd centos/5.7
for i in *; do ln $i ../5/$i; done
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast