[CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution
James Nguyen
james at callfire.comThu Sep 15 18:58:34 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution
- Next message: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I haven't seen this option before. Let me do some googling and see if it fits into the solution I'm looking for. Thanks =) On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe <jdmls at yahoo.com> wrote: > From: James Nguyen <james at callfire.com> > > > So the premise for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*.i686 > in my yum.conf. > > While doing a yum update I come across missing package dependencies for > instance mkinitrd for the i386 package. > > What about using multilib_policy=best instead? > > JD > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- james h nguyen | lead systems architect | www.callfire.com | 1.949.625.4263 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110915/1ff4be7c/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution
- Next message: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list