[CentOS] transition to ip6

Tue Apr 3 00:35:08 UTC 2012
Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org>

On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:11 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:39:17PM +0200, Peter Eckel wrote:
> > network. Security-wise there is no difference as you'll never get smaller
> > allocations than /64 per site anyway, so what with respect to filterin
> *gigglefit
> One of my providers gave me a single(!) IPv6 address.  Another one has
> subdivided a /64 into multiple /96's (one for each customer).
> You might want to rethink the /64 concept!

Yea.  The clean delegation of IPv6 address space is a beautiful idea.
Now sit back and watch while providers decimate the entire concept.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120402/5f57fd8b/attachment-0005.sig>