On 04/16/2012 11:49 PM, dnk wrote: > I myself am running: > > > httpd-2.2.22 > php-5.2.17 > mysql-server-5.1.58 I want to point out here that 5.2.17 is the last release of the 5.2 branch and that it is NOT being updated for security by php.net any more. There are already unpatched vulnerabilities. The 5.1.x (and php53) versions from EL5 will continue to get security updates until EL5 goes EOL. If you have to use php-5.2.x then 5.2.17 is the one to use ... however, it is not safe. As to the question of what is different ... I think many 3rd party packages from repoforge and EPEL will not work well with php53 ... but if you are staying inside the php53 universe, it should be OK. > > from Jason Litka's (utterramblings) repo. > > http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ > > No issues here. > > D > > > On 2012-04-16, at 3:18 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 >> minimum. >> >> Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. >> >> >> What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP >> rpms) to PHP53? >> >> Much thanks, >> >> Max Pyziur >> pyz at brama.com >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120417/70d44f16/attachment-0005.sig>